Russ Adcox of the Maury Hills Church (ex of Christ) in his blog is working on the Law of Silence to justify fellowship with the Christian Church. This, as in the case of his mentors, is on the path to adding instrumental music. Otherwise, how is it that he has so much free time to "fellowship" instrumentalists and charismatics and destroys fellowship of others by doing so and LIFTING the name of CHRIST from Maury Hills Church? In Hohenwald he ripped the county churches apart so that he could prove his spirituality by working with a denominational group. Does the world REALLY need to be AFFIRMED to make the faith of Russ valid? Jesus SENT evangelists preach the gospel which can be AIDED only at the peril of exhalted people. In the world of simple simon, the word SPEAK means the OPPOSITE of poetry and music as the word MUSIC is the opposite of SOUND MIND.
David Faust delivered the same mantra in favor of instrumental music at FHU in 2006. We have begun a review by showing some of the many more biblical examples of music being the CAUSE or MARK of having misused God and God having removed them from His WORD and from His GRACE. Rather than the Temple Dedication animal sacrifice at Jerusalem being an example of causing God to jump and jive in the Most Holy Place. The truth FACT is that God shut off the Ark of the Covenant so that only one person in the whole nation and once a year could come NOT boldly before the throne of Grace. We will look at the other examples which they somehow twist into a bad lie.
One of the biggest and most popular lies--repeated by the elders--is that cogregational singing is JUST our tradition or heritage. That means that opposition top the use of instruments is just something you INHERITED from your parents and cannot ever have used any kind of study and thinking. The fact is that these false teachers can find NO church father or founder of a denomination who was not Bible literate and knew that music is always defined as ENCHANTMENT or SORCERY and exercises an unfair mind control and almost always to condition people to accept gross error.
They truly have been deceived to think that those who left when people FORCED instruments into THEIR congregation just INVENTED the idea of what they call A capella singing. Fact is that none of the denominations which leaped into churches of Christ had NEVER used instruments. No: not even the Catholics engaged in "congregational singing with instrumental accompaniment."
If you have a minimalist grasp of the assembly, Qahal or "church in the wilderness" in Numbers you understand that the Sabbath or REST defined reading and rehearsing the Word of God and OUTLAWED the alarm or triumph over which included instruments and 'making a joyful noise before the Lord.' This musical MOCKERY was prophesied of Judas trying to divert Jesus from His purpose.
These false elders and preachers will find not one jot or tittle of Biblical or historical evidence which does not grasp that music is EXCLUDED when you want to engage the SPIRIT or MIND.
Using special music for special "keeping of days" automatically SOWS DISCORD with all of those once considered brethren. No one doubts that special use intends to FULL USE.
We have shown on the Richland Hills forum that even after a decade hidden but active agenda, the preacher still had to lie about every Biblical passage and historical scholar. These people have been SORCERIZED or "Saucerized" by self-seeking people because the PROOF TEXTS come verbatim from men like Tom Burgess who lies about all of the PLUCKING history. Furthermore, in context, all of these plucking the harp references point to older males seducing young male "ministers of the gods" whose hair had been plucked.
Russ Adcox returned to Hohenwald filled with ACU, Max Lucado and the Purpose Driven Cult and created shudders before he arrived. He tried to introduce the Purpose Driven "Cult" and began "fellowshiping" a denominational church and leading the youth in that direction. At the same time there was a move to add the little erotic "praise singing" and brought in a "preacherling" known NOT to believe in baptism and saw no problem with instrumental music. The gongs and clangs was that of becoming a community church (commune) by removing the name of CHRIST. Our little town will someday build a momument to something more notorious than the OK corral shootout. See the letters after trying to reason with the "elders."
THE LAW OF SILENCE.
Of course, to the Bible reader, God has never been silent about always connecting music as worship as a Satanic device to silence the Word-Based discipline of a Spirit God whom you cannow worship with your body. Jesus exampled and Paul commanded the ekklesia as a school of the Bible where the ACT is called SPEAKING. SPEAK is defined as the opposite of poetry or music. That is because poets and musicians write myts and never true history. Furthermore everyone knew that they "set their lies to melodies to deceive the simple minded."
No one in church history THOUGHT that God had been silent. It is, indeed, Russ and his mentors who use the LAW of silence. They say, "God hath NOT said 'thous shalt not use macines' so we are going to do it KNOWING that we will sow discord.
Russ gets his information from other ANTI-church of Christ writers who have no trouble just lifting out of context. For instance,
Russ quotes:T.B.Larimore was not noted for being controversial. T.R.Burnett who denied that the Church of Christ ever "belonged" to the Disciples and so could NOT have split commented while DENYING Russ a role on the good ship church.
Here's What I'm Talking About
T.B. Larimore (1843-1929) was a preacher in our heritage around the time of the split over instrumental music. He refused to make it an issue (i.e. was silent where the Bible is silent). Throughout his ministry he continued preaching in both instrumental and non-instrumental churches. Naturally, he was criticized sharply. In 1897 someone wrote an article in the Christian Standard demanding that Larimore take a side in the debate. Here's part of Larimore's response:
Never, publicly or privately, have I expressed opinion or preference relative to any of these "matters"...over which brethren are wrangling and disputing and dividing the church of Christ--NEVER. Rather, I am for Christ and I believe I can do for him, his cause and humanity without meddling in these "matters"; hence I let them alone, and just simply "preach the Word," "the gospel of Christ," the power of God unto salvation."
"The city churches know very well how to settle the pastor question, and stop the division over that issue.
Just send the hired preacher out to preach the gospel, which is his scriptural duty,
and restore the elders to their Bible functions. But will they do it? Prof. T. B. Larimore once held a meeting that continued five months.
At the last sermon there were five confessions, and he said the meeting closed "too soon."
He wants to hold a meeting (before he dies) that shall continue one year. He is only seventy-two. Burnett's Budget
"The bishops to feed the flock, the deacons to serve in secular affairs, and the evangelists to carry the good news to the world. That is God's system. You can not beat it, unless you are wiser than God.
Larimore knew that DIVISION was in the air and as soon as he left the division happened:
“I am for Christ,” he said, “and I believe I can do more for him, his cause and humanity without meddling with these ‘matters’; hence I let them alone, and just simply ‘preach the Word,’ ‘the gospel of Christ’, the power of God unto salvation.” Larimore refused to make the issues of his day a matter of fellowship.
He stated, “Shall I now renounce and disfellowship all of those who do not understand these things exactly as I understand them? They may refuse to recognize or fellowship or affiliate with me; but I will never refuse to recognize or fellowship or affiliate with them- NEVER.” He confessed,
“I am as apt to be wrong as my brother for neither of us is infallible.” And for this reason he concluded, “I must love my brethren, and never refuse to fellowship them- ANY OF THEM- simply because we do not always understand all questions exactly alike.”
“I am for Christ,” he said, “and I believe I can do more for him, his cause and humanity without meddling with these ‘matters’; hence I let them alone, and just simply ‘preach the Word,’ ‘the gospel of Christ’, the power of God unto salvation.”
Russ, is of course reading from Doglas Foster naively asserts, "if everyone had had T. B. Larimore's attitude, the problems would never have been blown up into divisive issues in the first place" (Ibid. p. 158). Either he doesn't know or chooses not to mention that the progressive brethren did not have that sweet, passive spirit. They were determined to have instruments in our churches and involve all in their missionary societies. They pushed their agenda and even resorted to stealth to gain control of congregations. If all had passively stood by, all would have been swept away. The same is true today.
That is how Purpose Driven Cultists boast about how to infiltrate and divert a church: we call that lying, cheating and stealing.
Russ is wrong: the INSTRUMENTALISTS had already SPLIT the church.
During the controversy, Bro. Larimore held a lengthy gospel meeting for the church in Sherman, Texas. Dr. Foster mentions that the progressives of the church in Sherman were meeting at separate times from the conservatives so they could worship with their instruments (Ibid. p.152). This is similar to the "alternative services" modern change agents use to get a foot hold in a conservative church. A year later he notes that the "pro-instrument faction withdrew to form what they called the First Christian Church" (Ibid.). If our change folks cannot take the property, you can expect them to leave in order to worship as they wish.
In time of war, every patriotic citizen does his part to help his nation through the conflict. Some produce food, others produce war materials. Some are warriors, some are medics. Some drive supply trucks, others fly bombers that rain death on the enemy. Some plan strategies, others process the paperwork. But all who faithfully do their part are good citizens who together serve their nation. So it is in the church. While we do not fault Bro. Larimore's passive stand, but neither should we fault Tolbert Fanning, David Lipscomb, Jacob Creath, Jr., Benjamin Franklin or the other noble men who fought valiantly to save a remnant from the apostasy that confronted them. We are much indebted to them for the survival of the church and our existence today. JHWaddey.
Worse than being divisive, the introduction of musical "worship" has always been a mark of gender confused people who at the same time are quite Biblically illiterate.
Ancient literature from Babylonian tablets and beyond agree with Johannes Quasten. In Music and Worship in Pagan and Christian Antiquity, beginning on page 41 He uses many of the church Fathers and Classical resources we also rely upon:
"Philodemus considered it paradoxical that music should be regarded as veneration of the gods while musicians were paid for performing this so-called veneration. Again, Philodemus held as self deceptive the view that music mediated religious ecstasy. He saw the entire condition induced by the noise of cymbals and tambourines as a disturbance of the spirit.
He found it significant that, on the whole, only women and effeminate men fell into this folly.
Accordingly, nothing of value could be attributed to music; it was no more than a slave of the sensation of pleasure, which satisfied much in the same way that food and drink did.
Similar opinions may be found in the writings of Philo. On one occasion he spoke of the Jewish "Feast of Fasting," used by the Greeks for the Day of Atonement:
"Now, many a man from the false religions, which are not ashamed of criticising what is noble, will ask: how can there be a feast without carousing and overeating, without the pleasant company of hosts and guests, without quantities of unmixed wine, without richly set tables and highly stacked provisions of everything that pertains to a banquet, without pageantry and jokes,
bantering and merry-making to the accompaniment of flutes and citharas, the sound of drums and cymbals and other effeminate and frivolous music of every king,
enkindling unbridled lusts with the help of the sense of hearing. For in and through the same [pleasures] those persons openly seek their joy, for what true joy is their they do not know.
Women's singing was a vital part of all pagan worship. In very early times women became priestly singers of the gods in the temple.
Click for the UNIVERSAL effeminate and hostile takeover as the Mother of Harlots (Rev 17) who uses singers and musicians a SORCERERS (Rev 18) who HAD deceived the whole world and PUT OUT the candles. That is why Jesus takes his DIVINE nature of CHRIST off the signs: the Anathema is proven by historical uses as God "dedicating them for a sacrifice of fire.""Women and girls from the different ranks of society were proud to enter the service of the gods as singers and musicians. The understanding of this service was universal: these singers constituted the 'harem of the gods'." (End of Quasten)
And why Jesus CAST OUT the Musical Minstrels LIKE DUNG when they proposed ot AIID His wok.
A challenger is relighting the discussion at Richland Hill's forum and I will prove that ALL of the proofs for instruments proves that Scripture is silent ONLY to those to who Jesus WILL NOT speak. When you are forced to TWIST all known evidence it NORMAL that you hear only SILENCE: that is what Jesus did to the Jewish Clergy afflicted with Dionysus worship both perverted and perverting.
Click to see that ALL of the LOUD passages condemng instruments as the INSTRUMENT or MACHINE used by Lucifer or Satan who is called the "Singing and harp playing prostitute" in the garden of Eden.
Russ has also removed CHRIST out of the picture proving that the hidden agenda for Hohenwald was FACT and not LIES: someone needs to repent. My view is that Jesus came and REMOVED the Lampstand where the SPIRIT means "the seven spirits OF Divine knowledge" to be known only through ONE NAME: Jesus Christ.
Of course, the Law of silence is valid based on the Bible and most scholars who grasp that to be a "christian" group you define faith and practices by the CENI principle.
Russ gets his information from bad resources which I will shortly "fill in the blanks." We should not let good men like Larimore BE SILENCED.
First,, no one in church history believed that the Bible was SILENT about the use of instrumental music. In the garden of Eden the SERPENT-for bible scholars-speaks of a Musical Enchanter. With a Bible filled with prophetic association between music and idolatry it ends defining the Mother of Harlots for our end times (Rev 17) In Rev 18 John defines the religious operatives: slick speakers, singers and instrument players as SORCERERS who HAD deceived the whole world.
Secondly, all of the definitions of singing and instrument words carry the idea of enchantment or SORCERY. Why? Why, because music silences the rational or spiritual mind so that people can be filled with swill and THINK that they always understood it that way.
Anyone who has deliberately sowed discord by blaming the SHOT for the spilled blood in Honenwals should clearly understand that the HIDDEN AGENDA of the false shepherds were to to become WOLVES which in itself has some vile musical connotations.
If you are watching the Hohenwald Forum where free people are not SQUASHED like bugs, remind your friends that we will go over the Law of Silence which is used ONLY by those who want to deliberately SOW DISCORD by adding "music teams" and instruments. In addition, I will post a review of Russ' misunderstanding of men like Larimore who knew that "evangelists" GO OUT and preach and do not get involved with the WRANGLING by non-productive preacher: The missed point is that the WRANGLING was MANUFACTURED by false teachers IMPOSING instruments into peaceable churches.
Musical Worship Index proves 100% of the world REBUKES the modern musicators.
Home Page