Romans 14: ACU Rubel Shelly

Abilene Christian University (ACU): Romans 14: Rubel Shelly at the Restoration Forum XII - Abilene Christian University (ACU), Rubel Shelly at the Restoration Forum XII - Abilene Christian University (ACU)

In Romans 14 Paul defined some of the DIVERSITIES of the Orphics, Dionysiacs and Pythagoreans.

In Romans 15 Paul does not PAUSE, but OUTLAWS the form of vocal and instrumental music used by these sects to arouse PLEASURING. Paul outlawed it and the words point to arousal singing with or without instruments as used by the DEMAGOGUES to draw away people for their own PURPOSES which connects to HERESY a form of the singing/lifting word. The word KLEPTOMANIA is associated.

Paul outlaws DOUBTFUL DISPUTATIONS because the Ekklesia or Synagogue or school of the Bible has no performance preachers, singers or musicians. It has only MUTUAL DIALOGERS.

Jesus defined those who SPEAK ON THEIR own in songs and sermons as SONS OF THE DEVIL. He defined the MOUTH religion specificially by connecting BEAUTIFUL SINGING and WELL PLAYED instruments to those who came to hear the prostitutes or Sodomites: there is NO intention of obeying the word. It is all performance.

"Clergy's" Job is to TAKE AWAY THE KEY to knowledge. And "see godliness as a means of financial gain." That parses to HIRELING meaning "one who is hired" and to PROFESSION.

2 Cor 2:17 For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.

Kapeleuo (g2585) kap-ale-yoo'-o; from kapelos , (a huckster); to retail, i.e. (by impl.) to adulterate (fig.): - corrupt

kapêl-euô ,

A. to be a retail-dealer, drive a petty trade... kapêleu' drive a trade, chaffer with your vegetable food Hdt.1.155

II. c. acc., sell by retail, ton herpin Hippon.51 .

2. metaph. sell learning by retail, hawk it about, 2 Ep.Cor.2.17 ; so eoiken ou kapêleusein machên will not peddle in war, i. e. fight half-heartedly, têi Chariti tên amoibên Epicur. politeian traffic in grants of citizenship, of prostitutes, playing tricks with life, [p. 876] corrupting

The word ADULTERY and KLEPTO is associated with this verse. The concept of arousal singing to produce the outlawed PLEASURING is also connected with KLEPTOMANIA by the "heretics" who LIFT YOU UP to carry you away for THEIR OWN PLEASURES.

Hdt.1.155 Heredotus: Cyrus told how to take the FIGHT out of the enemy: [4] But pardon the Lydians, and give them this command so that they not revolt or pose a danger to you: send and forbid them to possess weapons of war,
...........and order them to wear tunics under their cloaks
.......... and knee-boots on their feet,
.......... and to teach their sons lyre-playing [kitharizein]
.......... and song [psallein] and dance
.......... and shop-keeping [huckstering].
.......... And quickly, O king,
........... you shall see them become women instead of men,
........... so that you need not fear them, that they might revolt."

Like I always say as EVERYONE always says, the word PSALLO never includes an instrument unless the PLUCKING word is added and the NAME of the instruments.

The commanded act is to SPEAK one to another.
The commanded method is with ONE MIND and ONE MOUTH
The commanded resource is "that which is written"
The commanded purpose is to teach and adomonish one another
The commanded worship result is that we glorify GOD by speaking His Words
The commended result is that we keep the unity which even discussing the musical practices of the SECTARIANS in Rome would produce.

Therefore, for any disciple with A holy spirit Romans 15 OUTLAWS any form of musical or rhetorical performance. I don't know how people who "see godliness as a means of financial gain" or occupation intend to pay back the widows and hard working honest people.

See more notes on Romans 14. The synagogue is defined by Paul in Romans 15.

Jeff Childers and Frederick Aquino At the river's Edge: ACU'S damage control has the same pseudo scholars making the same SELF-COMPOSED explanation of Baptism which LIT THE FIRES. For heaven's sake: Baptism is connected to the BIRTH of Jesus? 7/23/04

Don't Miss Number four: 7/7/03 Shelly at ACU: Wine Drinking focus and DIRTY PICTURES of the New Style Worship. Instrument players were always perverted and known as PARASITES.

Part One Assault of the church of Christ

This is Part Two

Part Three Chapter 15 defines the LAW that one cannot produce SPIRITUAL excitement and still "glorify God with one voice" by speaking "that which is written." That of course was by the Spirit of Christ (1 Pet 1:11). Chapter 15 repudiates Rubel Shelly's distortion of Romans 14.

See new Summary of Rubel Shelly at ACU on Music and Wine.

> C. Leonard Allen and Richard T. Hughes: Discovering our Roots? No. Calvin: "There is no more marked manifestation of God's wrath than the fact that he permits the decline of his spoken and written Word." When God pours out His wrath, He sends BUFFOONS.

> Royce Money ACU "can't determine the foundation of the church."

> Carrol D. Osburn: Training people to play leading PROPHETIC roles in CHANNELING and FACILITATING change.

In this second section, Rubel Shelly begins:

Rubel Shelly, ACU: My comments here will be based on Romans 14:1 through 15:13. This section of Paul's most sublime epistle deals with doctrinal difference among baptized believers.

This is ALWAYS used to justify INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC which MUST be imposed on those who object to deliberately sow discord.

In fact, Romans 15 OUTLAWS even arousal forms of singing and WORSHIP LEADERS Shelly claims are MEDIATORS because they can lead you into the presence of God.

This agrees with Colossians 3, Ephesians 5 and many other versions of TEACHING the word where the word MELODY is not mentioned.

The word PSALLO or MELODY people LUST to use is used ONLY of perverted males grooming young boys as "ministers of the gods" for sodomy. It is a WARFARE word and never a MUSICAL WORD

I thought it was about non-doctrinal opinion differences between meat-eaters and vegetarianism. Well "pot lucks" may make this important to those who refuse to go out into the cold.

A Doctrinal Difference is a Christ Taught principle. The allowable differences are based on traditions or not-understood Biblical teaching. The "acceptance" of brethren, Christian or fraternal, does not inform us about their baptized state.

This scam intends to prove that "instrumental music" was a non-taught doctrinal difference and that we should tolerate (fellowship) those who use instruments as a secular, carnal attempt to worship a Spirit God. Paul Woodhouse of Grace Church of Christ claims that instrumental music is actually commanded by Paul.

The fact that instrumental worship can be sold as simply an allowable option is the doctrinal ignorance which can be tolerated within a given congregation, but the instrumentalist is not permitted to make an issue out of his 100% opinion with 0% evidence, while vocal teaching as "singing" is doctrinal or Christ-Taught.

Rubel Shelly, ACU: Returning now to Romans, some weak brothers were advocating a no meat (verse 2), no holiday, holy day (verse 5), no wine (verse 21) position.

And insisting that everyone embrace their understanding and practice.

And that the whole church must adopt a policy of eating no meat, observing no holiday (holy day), drinking no wine.

And they passed harsh judgment on those who viewed any of those issues differently.

This is why Jesus built and Paul DIRECTLY commanded the SYNAGOGUE or school of the Bible in Romans 15. The personal preferences WERE NOT discussed in the SCHOOL except Scripture would teach AGAINST these practices in time.

Rom 14:1 HIM that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations.

Rom 14:2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs.

From the English text this TOLERANCE is only about foods and "holy days." NEITHER of these were remotely connected to the kingdom of God. Therefore, Paul COMMANDS us to teach the WEAK but he gives us some common sense: don't MOCK, despise and publically ridicule those who will not, in the Shelly world, affirm CHOIRS and MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS.

Perhaps no one has made a bigger career out of RIDICULING those who reject trying to worship a Spirit God in the PLACE of our own human spirit using MACHINES. The fact is that 100% of the evidence repudiates all of the MUSICAL or performance concepts of "church."

Shelly etal make those who TEACH against instrumental music into a mockery through well-funded JUBILEES or traffick in books.

Therefore, if the truth were desired, Shelly and the Stoneites are fatally guilty of violating everything Paul has said in Romans 14 and 15.

By understanding the MEANING of the words and by looking at the culture to which Paul POINTS we know that he was specificially pointing to the Orphics where Orpheus was 'that Thracian" who along with the Lesbian women singers INVENTED religion defined by the Greek Threskia. This form of MUSICAL worship was always polluted or NOT-PURE. Pure religion on the other hand was to take care of the weak and NOT to fleece them for sermonizing. They were the only VEGETARIANS of note in Rome at this time. The Dionysiacs were the meat eaters and wine drinkers.

Both Orphics and Dionysiacs used MUSIC to induce pleasuring which Paul will condemn in Romans 15. They would also do bodily harm in the form of homosexuality (See Romans 1) and beating up of those who would not BOW when the musicians played, sang and danced.

By looking at the Bible and Greek literature we can clearly understand that Paul was condemning those who SPECIFICIALLY depended on performance and ritualistic RELIGION which depended on singing and instrumental music to INDUCE the sense of MADNESS Paul warrns the Corinthians about.

Those who WOULD NOT sing and dance--including Jesus of whom this was PROPHESIED--were mocked and even murdered.

The NEW STYLE worship Shelly promotes along with the once-Christian colleges is EXACTLY what many of the churches were AFFLICTED with. Romans 14 therefore denounces the MOCKING and RIDICULING of those who practiced the SYNAGOGUE explained in Romans 15

There were NO PREACHERS in the synagogue and NO PRAISE SERVICE.

Faithful churches of Christ WILL NOT make Shelly happy by adding or condoning instrumental music EVEN if the new Gnostics make a HUGE INDUSTRY trafficking on condeming those of whom Paul pronounced judgment.

There will be some MISSING stuff because Rubel Shelly has given himself permission to TAKE LIBERTIES to write his own "Narrative" for his time and place. John Chrysostom wrote.

Ver. 3. "Let not him that eateth, despise him that eateth not."

He does not say, let him alone,
nor does he say, do not blame him,
nor yet, do
not set him right;

but do not reproach him, do not "despise" him, to show they were doing a thing perfectly ridiculous.

But of this he speaks in other words. "Let not him which eateth not, judge him that eateth." For as the more advanced

made light of these, as of little faith, and falsely healed, and spurious, and still Judaizers, so they too judged these as law-breakers, or as given to gluttony.

And of these it is likely that many were of the Gentiles too. Wherefore he proceeds, for God hath received him.

Receiving a person does not mean AFFIRMING any difference beyond "Jesus and Him crucified." Rather, the RECEIVING is:

Proslambanô 3. c. acc. pers., take to oneself as one's helper or partner, by a second marriage, of admitting into the army,

The context is more meal fellowship than CHURCH MEMBERSHIP. We know for a fact that Shelly is a friendly guy but he WILL NOT let anyone who does not BOW to have "fellowship" in the sense of teaching WEAK things like "music AS worship has always been a sign of idolatry, sexuality and homosexuality."

Chrysostom continues: For when he is speaking of doctrines, hear what he says,

"If any one preacheth unto you any gospel other than that ye have received, let him be accursed" (Gal. i. 9), "even" if it be "an angel." And again,

"I fear lest by any means as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted." (2 Cor. xi. 3.)

Rom XIV:1Vulgate Now receive one who is weak in faith, but not for disputes over opinions.

XIV. Ton de asthenounta têi pistei proslambanesthe, mê eis diakriseis dialogismôn.

The thing is not concerned with fundamentals.

For the thing requisite is, if this person and the other are acting for God's sake, the thing requisite is (these words are repeated 3 mss.), if both terminate in thanksgiving. For indeed both this than and that give thanks to God.

If then both do give thanks to God, the difference is no great one.

Doubtful is the Greek and one may be CERTAIN that Shelly will NOT receive anyone in HIS church who harrangues the congregation that ALL of the evidence proves that MUSIC is sinful because it--like most preaching--tells God to SHUT UP:

Dialogismos (g1261) dee-al-og-is-mos'; from 1260; discussion, i.e. (internal) consideration (by impl. purpose), or (external) debate: - dispute, doubtful (-ing), imagination, reasoning, thought.

Dilogos A. double-tongued, doubtful, 1 Ep.Ti.3.8. "Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre; "

Disso-logeô, A. say twice, repeat, as in phrases like apist' apista, kaina kaina, Sch.E. Hec.688; go over again, Vett.Val.249.20. II. call in question, leave doubtful, Simp. in Cael.194.17.

I get e-mails and IF preachers did not say over and over and over--unless they are Bible believers--they would have to get an honest job.

Akritos a. pagos confused mass, 2. continual, unceasing,3. after Hom. in poets, countless, II. undecided, doubtful, 2. unjudged, untried, of persons and things; not capable of judging, engaged in rash attempts,

Disputations are the stock in trade of performance preachers.

diadik-azô ,

A. give judgement, go to law, dispute, diadikasomenos têi boulêi peri alêtheias Din.2.1 ; tauta diadikasometha peri tês sophias

b. submit oneself to trial,

Ro.14:3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.

[3] ho esthiôn ton mê esthionta mê exoutheneitô, ho de mê esthiôn ton esthionta mê krinetô, ho theos gar auton proselabeto.

To despise is not to THINK LESS OF: despise is what Shelly etal does when they MOCK and associate those will not AFFIRM instrumentalists with brother killers, fire bombers or muggers of ladies wearing furs.

To Pick or Choose:

Krino (g2919) kree'-no; prop. to distinguish, i.e. decide (mentally or judicially); by impl. to try, condemn, punish: - avenge, conclude, condemn, damn, decree, determine, esteem, judge, go to (sue at the) law, ordain, call in question, sentence to, think..

Exouthen-eô , A. = exoudenoô (cf. ou se exouthenêkasin, all' ê eme exousenôkasin LXX 1 Ki.8.7 ), ib.Wi.4.18, al., Ev.Luc.23.11, Ep.Rom.14.10, J.BJ6.5.4.

1 Kings 8: [7]WEB Yahweh said to Samuel, Listen to the voice of the people in all that they tell you; for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me, that I should not be king over them.

1 Kings 8: [8] According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt even to this day, in that they have forsaken me, and served other gods, so do they also to you. [9] Now therefore listen to their voice: however you shall protest solemnly to them, and shall show them the manner of the king who shall reign over them.

But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. Romans 14:10

Luke 23:[11]WEB Herod with his soldiers humiliated him and mocked him. Dressing him in luxurious clothing, they sent him back to Pilate. [12] Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day, for before that they were enemies with each other.

The word MOCK or DESPISE points DIRECTLY to the MUSICAL play by which the clergy or "children" PIPED trying to induce singing and dancing into Jesus. This was a perverted thing and there is NO OTHER connection in history between MUSIC and WORSHIP.

Exouthen-êma , atos, to,

A. object of contempt, e. laou LXXPs.21 (22).6.

Psalm 22:[4]WEB Our fathers trusted in you. They trusted, and you delivered them. [5] They cried to you, and were delivered. They trusted in you, and were not put to shame. [6] But I am a worm, and no man; A reproach of men, and despised by the people. [7] All those who see me mock me. They insult me with their lips. They shake their heads, saying,

Empaizô , fut.

A. -xomai LXXHb.1.10 : pf. empepaicha ib.Nu.22.29:-- mock at, mock, tini Hdt.4.134 ; tina PCair.Preis.3.10 (iv A.D.): abs., S.Ant.799:--Pass., psuchê hupo . . sômatôn kai pragmatôn empaizomenê Ph.1.568 , cf. Luc.Trag.333.

Sophocles, Antigone

Chorus

[791] You seize the minds of just men and drag them to injustice, to their ruin. You it is who have incited this conflict of men whose flesh and blood are one. [795] But victory belongs to radiant Desire swelling from the eyes of the sweet-bedded bride. Desire sits enthroned in power beside the mighty laws. [800] For in all this divine Aphrodite plays her irresistible game.

Commentary [800] empaizei, 'wreaks her will' in that contest which nikai implies. We find empaizô with a dat. (1) of the object, as Her. 4.134 empaizontas hêmin, 'mocking us': (2) of the sphere, as Ar. Th. 975 choroisin empaizei, 'sports in dances.' The en of empaizei here might also be explained as (a) in the imeros, or the blephara, i.e. by their agency: or (b) 'on her victim.' But the interpretation first given appears simpler. (Cp. Vergil's absol. use of illudere, G. 1. 181, Tum variae illudant pestes.)

Chorus

Start off [970] while you sing to the god of the lyre and to the chaste goddess armed with the bow. Hail! thou god who flingest thy darts so far, grant us the victory! The homage of our song is also due to Here, the goddess of marriage, [975] who interests herself in every chorus and guards the approach to the nuptial couch

Choros, ho, later of the dance as a public religious ceremony

II. choir, band of dancers and singers, h. Ven.118, Pi.N.5.23, Fr.199; sumphônia kai choroi Ev.Luc.15.25

Luke 15:25 Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing.

Sumphonia (g4858) soom-fo-nee'-ah; from 4859; unison of sound ("symphony"), i.e. a concert of instruments (harmonious note): - music.

Sumphonos (g4859) soom'-fo-nos; from 4862 and 5456; sounding together (alike), i.e. (fig.) accordant (neut. as noun, agreement): - consent.

2. generally, choir, troop, donakôn row of reeds, i. e. Pan's pipe,

III. place for dancing, en de ch. poikille . . Amphiguêeis Il. 18.590 ; leiênan de ch. Od.8.260 , cf. 264; hothi t' Êous êrigeneiês oikia kai choroi eisi 12.4 ; Numpheôn kaloi ch. êde thoôkoi ib.318; at Sparta the agora was called choros, Paus.3.11.9; so perh. in Crete, Supp.Epigr.2.509.6 (Eltynia, prob. v B. C.): v. infr. (Acc. to Hsch. choros = kuklos, stephanos, and therefore prop. denotes a ring-dance.)

The MARKET PLACE where they clergy would try to induce a homosexual song and dance was the AGORA.

Ekpaizô

A. laugh to scorn, mock at, LXX 1 Es.1.49(51), Phld.Rh.2.216S.

Isa 37:22 This is the word which the Lord hath spoken concerning him; The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised thee, and laughed thee to scorn; the daughter of Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee.

Leag (h3932) law-ag'; a prim. root; to deride; by impl. (as if imitating a foreigner) to speak unintelligibly: - have in derision, laugh (to scorn), mock (on), stammering.

Is.33:19 Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a stammering tongue, that thou canst not understand.

Except to Get Drunk, the Jews neve drank much FERMENTED wine:

"Much to the dismay of the wine industry, between the founding of the state in 1948 and until just five years ago, annual Israeli wine consumption remained at about 3.9 liters per capita. Compared to the 60 liter plus consumption of the French, Italians and Spanish, this was not very high. Nor was it high compared to the 11 liter figure of the United States. Resource.

A DRUNK drank wine, a tippler drank highly mixed wine and water but the common people drank the preserved fruit of the vine as a food.

[If wine is fine, beer is better]

No, what Paul really said was:

HIM that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. Romans 14:1

Receive means:

Proslambano (g4355) pros-lam-ban'-o; from 4314 and 2983; to take to oneself, i.e. use (food), lead (aside), admit to friendship or hospitality: - receive, take (unto).

Perhaps, the weak man was once a worshiper of Dionysus. The "in assembly" prophesying (singing with instruments) in Corinth strongly implicates as Dionysic those "just out of" paganism where drinking wine and "speaking in tongues" or composing their own "inspired songs."

The same is true of Ephesus where, in chapter 5, Paul prohibites the "wine drinkers" and demands speaking or preaching the revealed Word: psalms, hymns and spiritual songs.

Of Divininers Heredotus 2.49.1 Heredotus 2

XLIX. Now then, it seems to me that Melampus son of Amytheon was not ignorant of but was familiar with this sacrifice. For Melampus was the one who taught the Greeks the name of Dionysus and the way of sacrificing to him and the phallic procession; he did not exactly unveil the subject taking all its details into consideration, for the teachers who came after him made a fuller revelation; but it was from him that the Greeks learned to bear the phallus along in honor of Dionysus, and they got their present practice from his teaching. [2] I say, then, that Melampus acquired the prophetic art, being a discerning man, and that, besides many other things which he learned from Egypt, he also taught the Greeks things concerning Dionysus, altering few of them; for I will not say that what is done in Egypt in connection with the god and what is done among the Greeks originated independently: for they would then be of an Hellenic character and not recently introduced. [3] Nor again will I say that the Egyptians took either this or any other custom from the Greeks. But I believe that Melampus learned the worship of Dionysus chiefly from Cadmus of Tyre and those who came with Cadmus from Phoenicia to the land now called Boeotia.

musicians, sophistês . . parapaiôn chelun

Sophistês 1 [sophizomai]

I. a master of one's craft or art, an adept, of a diviner, Hdt.; of poets, Pind.; of the Creator, Plat.; metaph., s. pêmatôn an adept in misery, Eur.

2. like phronimos, one who is clever in matters of life, a wise man, in which sense the seven Sages are called sophistai, Hdt.; of Prometheus, Aesch.

I. at Athens, a Sophist, i. e. a professor of grammar, rhetoric, politics, mathematics, such as Prodicus, Gorgias, Protagoras, Thuc., Plat., etc. At first the Sophists were held in honour; but from their loose principles they fell into ill repute, and the word came to mean,

* 2. a sophist (in bad sense), a quibbler, cheat, Ar., Dem., etc.

Parapaiô 1

1. to strike on one side: to strike a false note, and metaph. to be infatuated, lose one's wits, Aesch.: --p. ti to commit a folly, Luc.

* 2. to fall away from, Lat. aberrare, tês alêtheias Polyb.

Chelus 1

I. a tortoise, Lat. testudo:--then, since Hermes made the lyre by stretching strings on its shell, which acted as a sounding-board, chelus came to mean the lyre, Hhymn. (to Merc.), Eur.

II. the arched breast, the chest, from its likeness of shape to the back of a tortoise, Eur.

However, Romans chapter 14 always has a chapter 13 and Paul demanded that the believer's life rises above tolerating a wine drinker at a common meal.

Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying: Romans 13:13

Komos (g2970) ko'-mos; from 2749; a carousal (as if a letting loose): - revelling, rioting.

The komo or comedy as the perverted sinnging and dancing of Dionysus. They are often shown with a new wineskin draped over their shoulders. You will noticed that they were usually UNCLOTHED.

But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfill the lusts thereof. Romans 13:14

Paul really said, don't let these weak people into your group and allow them to pass judgment. Paul did not consider wine drinking an iffy issue.

for as you eat, each of you goes ahead without waiting for anybody else. One remains hungry, another gets drunk. 1 Cor 11:21 (or perhaps just saturated)

Don't you have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you for this? Certainly not! 1 Cor 11:22

Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. 1 Cor 5:7

Old yeast inheres in the word Jubilee which is a defacto denial that Christ came to fulfill all Old Testament types, many of which were imposed because of Israel's "musical idolatry" at Mount Sinai:

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with
........... regard to a religious festival,
........... a New Moon celebration
........... or a Sabbath day. Col 2:16

These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. Col 2:17

"Judge" implies more than just trying to teach one against New Moon celebrations. Judging means that they try to force you to eat like they eat, drink what they drink, attend the religious festival, observe the New Moon or not do any work on Saturday.

Judging is insisting that strong people obey the Old Testament or pagan rituals when the strong brether knows that he is free.

Because "music" or more properly "noise" was part of the "like the nations" religious festivals and offering animal sacrifices, one who judges is the one who insists that we have no right to teach against it and that we must fellowship instrumentalists and any of the other "shadows."

A strong person knows that he can observe certain days. However, it would be judging to insist that he observe them in a religious sense.

Rubel Shelly, ACU: What Paul calls the strong brothers, on the other hand, could eat meat, celebrate holidays (holy days) and drink wine without offending their consciences.

Getting drunk on wine in Ephesians 5:18 is inconsistent with the church which is a school of the Bible. Just as in modern taverns, music and wine cannot be separated:

By looking at the literature as the only DICTIONARY of how words were used, getting FILLED with wine meant more than singing with wine in your tummy. Getting drunk and making external melody were intimately connected.

See the meaning of the Greek Symposium and Music, Wine, Homosexuality connection.

Even modern proponents of musical "worship" are strongly influenced by the god of the new wineskins: Dionysus. They used the same terms of wine as EXHILARATING WORSHIP. They must know that they are FLUTING DOWN with or without mechanical instruments the WORD of Christ and giving heed to Christ. The hallucination is that not Jesus Christ or God the Father but the indwelling HOLY SPIRIT person is directing the charismatic music and preaching. Music and wine were the weapons of the new wineskin or old Dionysus perverted worship:

kat-auleô, charm by flute-playing, tinos Pl.Lg.790e, cf. R.411a; tina Alciphr.2.1: metaph., se . . -êsô phobôi I will flute to you on a ghastly flute, E.HF871 (troch.):--Pass., of persons, methuôn kai katauloumenos drinking wine to the strains of the flute, Pl.R.561c; k. pros chelônidos psophon to be played to on the flute with lyre accompaniment, Posidon.10 J., cf. Call.Fr.10.3 P., Phld.Mus.p.49 K.

The word charm or charis from which people get "Charismatic" is the EARTHLY meaning of GRACE centered or not. Putting the focus on GRACE meant that sodomy usually in the form of pedaresty was part of worship and an appendage to ALL priesthoods.

Paul intended that the synagogue or school of the Bible not be just another tavern. Both the wine and the music would overpower or PIPE DOWN the mind so that study of the Bible was impossible. Therefore, look at the phrase:

The phrase: "methuôn kai katauloumenos (Drinking and overpowering with the flute.)"

> Katauleô

I. to play upon the flute to, tinos Plat.:--Pass., of persons, to have it played to one, id=Plat.:--Pass. to resound with flute-playing, Plut.

II. c. acc. pers. to overpower by flute-playing:--generally, to overpower, strike dumb, Eur.

> Methuô [methu] [only in pres. and imperf.; the fut. and aor. act. belong to methuskô]
........... I. to be drunken with wine, Od., etc.; m. hupo tou oinou
........... ........... Under your Wine
........... II. metaph. of things, boeiê methuousa aloiphêi an ox-hide soaked in oil, Il.
........... 2. of persons, to be drunken or intoxicated with passion, pride, etc., Xen., Plat.

Kat-auleô continues:

2. c. gen. loci, make a place sound with flute-playing, Thphr.Fr.87:-- Pass., resound with flute-playing, nêsos katêuleito Plu.Ant.56 .

The prase: nêsos katêuleito is:

Nêsos 1 an island, Lat. insula, Hom., Hes., etc.; en tai megalai Dôridi nasôi Pelopos, i. e. in Peloponnese, Soph.; makarôn nêsoi, v. sub makar. [Perhaps from neô to swim, as if floating land.]

And again.

Katauleô

I. to play upon the flute to, tinos Plat.:--Pass., of persons, to have it played to one, id=Plat.:--Pass. to resound with flute-playing, Plut.
II. c. acc. pers. to
overpower by flute-playing:--generally, to overpower, strike dumb, Eur.

II. in Pass., [ton monochordon kanona] parechein tais aisthêsesi . . katauloumenon SUBDUED by a flute accompaniment, Ptol.Harm.2.12: metaph., to be PIPED down, RIDICULED

III. c. acc. rei, play on the flute, ta mêtrôia Duris 16 J.:--Pass., to have played to one as an accompaniment on the flute, -oumenoi pros tôn hepomenôn ta mêtrôia melê D.H.2.19 .

A similar word is:

Katapsallô , play stringed instruments to, [sumposion] kataulein kai k. Plu.2.713e :--usu. in Pass., have music played to one, enjoy music, ib.785e; of places, resound with music, Id.Ant.56.

2. Pass., to be buried to the sound of music, Procop.Pers.2.23.

3. metaph., katapsalletai . . ho dêmiourgos is drummed out, Porph.Chr.34.

The phrase: sumposion kataulein speaks of the gathering of homosexual men where wine and flute players were popular. However, it is significant that if the group had any important issues to discuss they silenced the flute players.

> Sumposion 1 [sumpinô]
I. a
drinking-party, symposium, Theogn., Hdt., etc.
II. the room in which such parties were given, drinking-room, Luc.

And again for comparison:

> Katauleô

I. to play upon the flute to, tinos Plat.:--Pass., of persons, to have it played to one, id=Plat.:--Pass. to resound with flute-playing, Plut.

II. c. acc. pers. to overpower by flute-playing:--generally, to overpower, strike dumb, Eur.

The female instruments players were usually prostitutes and the male instrumentalists were sodomites to be USED after the festival. However, if they desired to discuss any issue they had to CAST OUT the musicians or parasites who couldn't keep their mouth shut.

See Rubel Shelly make the same accusation as the Jewish clergy: that Jesus was a winebibber and a wine manufacturer in the intoxicating sense. Several scholars see that as a deliberate attempt to wound the character of Jesus.

Didn't you hear what Paul just said?

These (Jubilee, Sabbath, holy days) are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. Col 2:17

A strong person "might" but a strong person would not deliberately restore the Jubilee and deny the Atonement of Christ who "restored" the order. If the wine drinker or Sabbath keeper or festival keeper was the strong person then why would Paul call them just shadows?

"Eating and drinking" is a ritual or fellowship activity.

So don't let anyone criticize you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating Jewish holidays and feasts or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. Col 2:16LIV
........... Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. Col 2:17

Don't let anyone criticize you or JUDGE you for not tolerating instrumental music in imitation of the "triumph over" of Jesus with instruments which murdered Him but freed us from the weak and beggarly elements.

Now, listen to Paul set the whole "christian" university system straight:

Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. Gal 4:8

But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? Gal 4:9

Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. Gal 4:10

I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain. Gal 4:11

This repudiates Rubel Shelly and declares that those who continued to practice Law-based observing of days and times and Sabbaths are the weak and in serious dangers members. These are the people who are to be silenced if they try to impose Sabbath assembly or Sabbath (Saturn) Eucharist "eating and drinking the gods."

However, until he was weaned off the observing of times and seasons (astrology) he could still meet with the people whose conscience would be mortally offended by bringing the Legalistic days into the Christian assembly.

The shadow was under the Monarchy where Israel "fired" God and demanded a king like the nations so that they could worship like the nations were involved in shadows.

Animal sacrifices were just shadows of the One Sacrifice of Christ.

Music was added under the gone-astray Monarchy and was never used except during animal sacrifices for dedicatory or purification rituals or to give glory to the civil courts.

The religious festivals were also just shadows.

Whatever people do in private, animal sacrifices and all that went with it are not related to the kingdom.

Therefore, Paul was not defining "kingdom" practices or "assembly" practices but ordinary superstitions about days and foods.

Do not allow what you consider good to be spoken of as evil. Rom 14:16

For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit, Rom 14:17

because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and approved by men. Rom 14:18

In the Haunted House by T. Maccius Plautus, the festival was really for Apollo:

PHANISCUS Really! why, yesterday and the day before, four, five, six days ago, all along, in fact, since his father went abroad from here, eating and drinking have never ceased for a single three days here.

THEUROPIDES What is it you say?

PHANISCUS That eating and drinking have never stopped for a single three days here, bringing in wenches, living like Greeks, hiring harpists and music-girls.

In the secular world, their idea of God always involved eating and drinking. Therefore in Christianity there is no handout for the musicians and rhetoricians as parasites. The priests and musical Levites who made noise and not music were fed by the people by a tithe of the food from the free lands. They ate and drank in the Temple court areas. And so did all of the pagan temples which were built specificially to BLEED OFF food from the poor and widows as did the Pharisees. The church as synagogue or school of the Bible had no free food to hand out to either Orphics or Dionysics so Christians had better follow the synagogue which had no STAFF roles of parasites:

Parasitus: (parasitos, "table companion"). denoted originally the priest's assistant, who, like the priest, received his SUPPORT from the offerings made to the temple, in return for certain services. These services included the COLLECTION and care of supplies of CORN due to the temple, assistance at certain SACRIFICES, and the preparation of the BANQUETS connected with certain festivals. Iin the Middle and New Greek COMEDY, where it means the hanger on, who plays the FLATTERER and BUFFOON, with a view to getting invited to dinner. The parasite was transferred as a standing character to the Roman imitations of Greek COMEDY, and figures largely in the plays of Plautus.

In the Postmodern churches people are told that the musicians fill the Levitical singer roles but this denies that Jesus paid the final price and tax. Furthermore, they insist that the preachers are the priests and the TITHE is still in effect to pay them. See Madison Church of Christ imitation of the Shelly plan. However, don't be fooled because Paul said that the kingdom is not about EATING and DRINKING accompanied by the musicians. Therefore, they are parasites:

Parasitos , ho, one who eats at the table of another, and repays him with flattery and buffoonery....

II. of priests who had their meals at the PUBLIC EXPENSE, Clitodem.11, Polem.Hist.78.
2. one who
dines with a superior officer, Arist.Fr.551.

Parasit-ia , hê, profession of a parasite, Luc. Par.37.
Parasit-eô , board and lodge with, tini Pl.La. 179b.
2.
play the parasite, aph' hou parasitô from the time I became a parasite,
II. to be honoured with a seat at the
public table, Plu.Sol.24 ; prop. of the priests named parasitoi

EPIDICUS, alone.) T. Maccius Plautus, Epidicus, or The Fortunate Discovert (ed. Henry Thomas Riley)

EPIDICUS (to himself) . I do think that in the Attic land there is no spot of land so fertile as is this Periphanes of ours; why, from the locked and sealed-up money-chest I summon forth silver just as much as I please. But this, i' troth, I am afraid of, that if the old man should come to know it, he'll be making parasites of elm-twigs Note 1

1 , to be shaving me quite clean. But one matter and consideration disturbs me--what music-girl, one that goes out on hire, I'm to show to Apæcides. (He muses.) And that as well I've got: this morning the old gentleman bade me bring for him on hire some music-girl to his house here, to sing for him while he was performing a sacrifice 2

She shall be hired, and be instructed beforehand in what way she's to prove herself cunning towards the old man. I'll away in-doors; I'll get the money out of the swindled old fellow. (He goes into the house of PERIPHANES.)

1 Parasites of elm-twigs: He alludes to the propensity of Parasites for devouring to the bone all who came in their way.

2 Performing a sacrifice: It was the custom, while private person were sacrificing to the Lares or household Gods, to have music performed upon the harp or the pipe.

The religious festivals have been abrogated. Therefore, the weak wine-drinker is not to impose his practices upon the church. The wineskin creed compares the worship assembly to the exhilaration which comes from drinking fermented, bubbling wine. This is a device to introduce the pagan belief that wine and music represented the presence of God causing the strange feelings.

These feelings were pure drug-induced or excitement-induced "highs" and do not represent the presence of the kingdom unless you implicate the King in the wine drinking or the pseudo-wine drinking, music-produced excitement.

Paul would say that the excitement of the flesh is the sign of a weak believer and they must not impose their practices upon the church. The spiritual "high" does not come from:

eating and drinking but from
righteousness, peace and joy in the Spirit of Christ Who promised to be in our midst without being called down by a musical performance.

So, whatever you think about Romans 14 the focus on the externals of eating and drinking are not kingdom related.

We might tolerate someone wanting "exhilaration" from worship but they are the weak brothers and cannot be allowed to impose their views upon the strong members.

Rubel Shelly, ACU: Frankly, it's a bit difficult to be sure where these points of view originated. I don't think we know. Were the "weak" Jewish believers who were offended by the Greek majority?

Or were the "weak" Gentile Christians whose philosophies had led them to some extreme ascetic type positions? We just don't know. That's a matter of opinion. Mere matter of opinion. Whatever the origin of their points of view, though, the problem's clear. They'd taken some doctrinal stances. And it's also clear that both groups were wrong and had sinned against each other.

The weak had tended toward legalism: judgment and condemnation. The strong had tended toward an air of superiority: judgment and condemnation.

The pagan background in Rome was of the Dionysics who were wine-drinking, meat-eating worshipers who depended heavily on instrumental music.

Dionysus the Meat- Eater's wine- drinkers flute- player's God. Count the favorable mentions of WINE in this review:

"Dionysus is a strange god. Although he is best known as the god of wine, he is also a vegetation deity, a god of the liquid element,

a death god,
a god who comes into and changes,
often irrevocably, the
normal community life,
and lastly the god of the theatre.

"The duality of dionysus is related to another of his attributes, which is that of loss of identity.

The postmodern theology are, if the truth be known, post garden of Eden and post Towers of Babylon. When people lost sight of God and rejected His Word He sent them strong delusions that they believe a lie and be damned. In the classical Book of Enoch or book of Jubilees and three dozen other ancient view, the children of Lamech including JUBAL they were used by SATAN to form mixed sex choirs, use instruments, dress, color, decoraton and perverted

Click to see the Feminine nature of restored Dionysus Wineskin religion. Dionysic music, dance and drama has always claimed to be mediators between God and man.

The modern ZOE concept of music and drama claim to be mediators between God and man.

The Orphics were the only "vegetarians" and they were also highly addicted to instrumental music to "bring them into the presence of the gods."

Josephus notes that Vegetarianism was a religious movement which was Orphic in nature. The Orphic religion was devoted to instrumental music. And incidentally, the Rhea or Zoe principle was intimately connected. Zoe or Sophia-Zoe or Eve was the one who forced the male "gods" to engage in musical worship teams. We look specificially at this in Romans 15. This article will direct you to Orphic music to determine whether you want those high male voices presiding over the flock.

"Orpheus was the most famous musician and poet of ancient times. His lyre, given to him by Apollo (after he invented the Cithara), could enchant not only the wild animals, but the trees and rocks as well. As will become obvious, Orphism is closely related in many ways to Dionysus, and could be considered a reform of the Dionysian Mysteries and is often regarded as the highest religious form in the ancient world.

Note the Cithara - parasite connection in this article.

"Orpheus is said to have travelled to Egypt, where he learnt from the priests there and became the most learned among the Greeks in all that concerns the Gods and their initiatory rites. He excelled in the beauty of his verse and song, and was believed to have discovered mysteries and how to achieve purification from sins, cures of diseases and means of averting divine wrath. These early rites were said to be very similar to those of Dionysus but have also been linked to the rites of Osiris and Isis."

"There are many stories of his death. Rejecting all women after the death of his wife, Orpheus was torn to pieces by Thracian women; or in another version, he was dismembered by Maenads (at Deium in Macedonia) at the urging of Dionysus, who resented Orphic rejection of sacrificial murder and the worship of Apollo (in whose temple Orpheus served as a priest).

The Oracle at Delphi to Apollo was quite identical to modern Seeker-Centers used to dispense the "new wineskin" religion, women, music, theater, swimming pool, gymnasium and gender-variant sex.

"There is more about the Thracian women. They were said to have been put up to their task by Dionysus who was angry against Orpheus because Orpheus had looked into the rites of the God.

"The Thracian women plotted his death, because he had persuaded their husbands to follow him in his wanderings and that, first after having drinking much wine, they dared to kill him; hereafter, it is said their men adopted the custom to march to battle drunk. Some believe he was killed near Mount Pieria, and close to this place an urn was preserved, which was said to contain the bones of Orpheus.

"It is also told that when the women who killed Orpheus wished to wash off in a river the blood-stains, the river sank underground, not wishing to lend its waters to cleanse manslaughter.

"Orphic initiates (and the stricter Pythagoreans) were vegetarians and also agreed to lifestyle and dietary restrictions, like not eating beans (apart from the effects beans have on the human body, they also resemble parts of it.) Pausanias mentions that Demeter gave the human race the products of the earth excluding beans.

The refusal to kill and to eat animals, was a radical step in a world of general sacrifice to the Gods, and cut them off from many of the State ceremonies."

Paul had the same solution which he commanded to the Ephesians and Colossians: that they teach and admonish one another with the Word of Christ (Spirit of God) with the singing and melody in the heart.

Rather, than Romans 14 giving all of those who lust for the sexual stimulation provided by musical and theatrical performance, Romans 15 was the absolute and only way in which diverse groups could meet in the Christian assembly which was most often the "synagogue."

In these meetings, one did not gather to get his "fix" with a religious high. Rather, the assembly or synagogue was almost exclusively to worshp God in the only way one can worship Him "in spirit" or in the mind and "in truth" which dishonors Christ if we use our own words. This, Jesus says, makes one a liar like Satan who "speaks on his own."

Again, look at Dr. Shelly's consistent method of cutting verses into halves or quoting just up to the "punch line."

That is darn handy and using the "core principle" of Narrative Theology to take fragments and construct one's own narrative.

Never mind that rather than giving permission for "music"--which is never a Biblical, worship word--Paul issues a direct command which for a One Another teaching process:

> Is the only way to fulfill the concept of worship "in spirit" rather than "in the carnal body" and in "truth" as the Words of Christ as opposed to using Satan's method of "speaking of his own" and being called by Jesus "a liar."

> It is the only way to prevent the "sowing of discord" if two instrumental music sects did their own thing.

> Contrary to this, those who introduce instruments or 'theatrical performers' know beforehand and with a high hand "sow discord" and "offend many of these little ones." This is the terminal, beyond redemption consequence of rejecting all but the CORE GOSPEL and being sent a strong dilusion which, in the pagan world, was most often with new wine, women and instrumental performance: "The idolatry of talent." James treats "respect of persons" as the "trap stick" which drops the entire Law on one's head.

When David sang to the Gentiles it was the musical "triumph over" which Judas would try on Jesus. David shed the blood OF the Gentiles. However, Christ shed His blood FOR the Gentiles and His "singing" is not the Hebrew, musical war chant but the gospel of peace.

Rubel Shelly, ACU: The doctrine, I repeat, doctrine, held by either group was tolerable to Paul. Paul said, "Now, there's a right on each of these. But it's okay for you to hold whichever position you're committed to."

It was difficult to the charismatic pagans to abandon their deeply-held beliefs. Therefore, Paul said that you can "receive" a wine drinker in the sense of meal fellowship. Or, you can receive him into the collective assembly which HAD NO PRAISE SERVICE and assuredly NO INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC for the purpose of doing "synagogue." That is, you could receive a vegetarian musical member into the assembly to be taught by the revealed Words of Christ. However, Paul did not approve of their old superstition and neither should we.

If a WINE DRINKER or a drunkard wants to attend "synagogue" he can attend. If you want to take him to lunch you do not sin by that association. However, it is a sign of terminal ignorance to allow such a lost person to defend wine drinking as something Paul would approve of when the "proof text" is that Jesus also drank wine, manufactured 180 gallon of the pure stuff for an already drunken wedding party with a young bride sure to get pregnant, and therefore THE INCARNATE GOD OF THE UNIVERSE endorses wine drinking. How can you fall into such depths. That happens when you believe and teach the CORE GOSPEL and insist that all of the rest is a product of Narrative Theology made to fit the occupaton of the Bible writers.

Paul did not mean to rule out association with these weak people but certainly the Orphic, musical vegetarian sect should not promote their pagan musical worship.

Rubel Shelly, ACU: The doctrine held by either group was tolerable to him, but the attitude displayed by both groups was intolerable to him.

Thus, Paul was grieved that harsh feelings over these non-fundamental issues were causing a rift in the church.

So, he reminded them that Jesus is the Lord over all believers (verse 9), and told them that they had no right, no right, to sit in judgment on each other (verses 10 and 11).

Paul said that a strong person can either rest on Saturday or mow the lawn on Saturday. It is not part of Christian teaching. However, Paul did not say that he was wishy-washy or held no opinion. We noted that he was totally afraid of believers who continued to believe Legalistic or Paganistic superstitions.

Paul wasn't talking about a church but a SYNAGOGUE or ekklesia. The ekklesia was a school of the Bible and of Christ. Paul wasn't telling them to TOLERATE old habits of DRINKING WINE but to leave all such discussions out of the assembly which was not like their PAGAN WORSHIP RITUALS. He was not telling them to TOLERATE MUSIC but in chapter fifteen defined the synagogue and repudiated ANYTHING used by charismatic musicians to LADE the burden of exciting spiritual anxiety. That would include CHARISMATIC preaching which, in Corinth, was the most divisive OLD TRADITION of counting disciples.

He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it.

He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks;
and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks. Romans 14:6

Because they didn't eat meat and observe days and seasons "in the church" Paul is still speaking of social discourse: meal fellowship. He is not defining how "I" can add instrumental instruments to the church assembly and say that "you" have no right to pass judgment upon it.

They didn't drink wine in church so we cannot add instruments to "worship" misusing Paul. They didn't tolerate eating meat sacrificed to idols on the Lord's Table so there is no logic to add either the Dionysic or Orphic music to the worship.

If I meet a friend for lunch and I know that he drinks wine, I receive him or "have meal fellowship" with Him but I do not endorse him or miss an opportunity to warn him. Perhaps he can drink will all of his life and not get addicted.

John the Baptist would not meet at a meal in a public sense because wine would be present. The liars used this to prove that Jesus was a winebibber or wine dinker. Jesus said in effect: "you are liars." And so they were.

But...

Rubel Shelly, ACU: These same issues are still matters of doctrine, not opinion, among people in our churches. We don't have many who press for vegetarianism. I've met a few. They wear fake fur coats. (laughter) I can take you to some who argue vehemently about the appropriateness of Christians observing Passover or Christmas, or Earth Day.

And I guarantee that I can cause a church fight in your congregation by putting the question, "Can a Christian drink alcoholic beverages?" on the floor.

I can guarantee that you will have one with the Holy, Incarnate God of the universe over that one. If drinking wine is a second order truth (actually promoted by the wineskin creed) then dancing naked (ala David) is a second order truth. We have heard it used as "an approved example" for Christian worship!

Just settle the issue and tell everyone that Paul said eat and drink at home. So wine drinking is clearly not a doctrinal, meaning a Christ-taught "act of worship" for the assembly.

So, it is not rational to jump from social drinking to permitting an organ or "Sister Singers" to flaunt their fares on stage standing between God and His people.

Rubel Shelly, ACU: And the disputants will not be content to say their point of view is a mere matter of opinion, either, and "It's fine with me, brother, if you do otherwise." Either side will appeal to the Bible and believe that it's case is right and the other's wrong.

And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; Eph 5:18

Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord; Eph 5:19

FORASMUCH then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; 1 Pet 4:1

That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. 1 Pet 4:2

For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable 1 Pet : 1 Pet 4:3

The conclusions of the false accusers and Fred:

and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. Matt 11:19a

Who are they? They are the adversaries of Christ.

What was the response of Jesus?

But wisdom is justified of her children. Matt 11:19b

We might say: "The proof of the pudding is in the eating." Therefore, if Jesus was a tippler or winebibber then they could say: "We saw you drunk in the market." Since they didn't have any evidence then Jesus called them liars.

Jesus said "I drank."

You say "I'm a drunk."

You have no witnesses therefore your accusations are the children of your folish lying.

Jesus DRANK but the BLASPHEMERS said that He DRANK WINE:

Oiopotes (g3630) oy-nop-ot'-ace; from 3631 and a der. of the alt. of 4095; a tipler: - winebibber.

Rubel Shelly gives you his permission to DRINK WINE where even "communion wine" is spiked up to about 18% alcohol. You couldn't drink a glass of modern wine without being guilt of:

Oinophlugia (g3632) oy-nof-loog-ee'-ah; from 3631 and a form of the base of 5397; an overflow (or surplus) of wine, i.e. vinolency (drunkenness): - excess of wine.

Phluaros (g5397) floo'-ar-os; from phluo, (to bubble); a garrulous person, i.e. prater: - tattler

The NEW WINE Rubel Shelly is speaking of is the BUBBLING wine which is a product of the WINE VAT and not of the wineskin.

Here is REVELLING. The little box on the flute case is the JUDAS BAG. Drinkin, music, music, dancing and perversion were part of the komo. The box contained "the mouthpieces of wind instruments." After all, Psalm 41 prophesied that Judas would try to TRIUMPH over Jesus. This word includes "blowing wind instruments and 'making a joyful noise before the Lord'." This was the WARRIOR'S PANIC ATTACK.

Komos (g2970) ko'-mos; from 2749; a carousal (as if a letting loose): - revelling, rioting.

Wine was a common beverage but those who diluted it 2 to 1 were identified as tipplers. That would be about 2% alcohol for most people. However, even one or two beers would get you booked as a DRUNK DRIVER if caught. History shows that as a common beverage the wine could be dilluted up to 20 to 1.

Hermes then defines a tippler:
........... Oh! the delicious tipple, half-wine, half-water!

Aristotle said:

And the pleasanter wine is not the wine pleasant to a man whose palate has been corrupted by tippling,

since sometimes they pour in a dash of vinegar, but to the uncorrupted taste.

And: For taste is concerned with discriminating flavors, as is done by wine-tasters, and cooks preparing savory dishes

Aristotle Politics: Or by the usage of language. Thus any